Professor Blankley teaches Alternative Dispute Resolution, Advocacy in Mediation, Mediation, and Arbitration. She first became interested in the field while in law school, where she earned a Certificate in Dispute Resolution. Her research has largely focused on how parties can customize alternative processes to suit their dispute-resolution needs. Her research also deals with the crossroads of alternative dispute resolution and legal ethics. Professor Blankley is an active member of the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, regularly speaking at their annual meeting. Additionally, she serves on the American Bar Association Law School Division Arbitration Competitions Committee, which oversees the annual law school Arbitration Competition. Professor Blankley is also a practicing mediator in Nebraska.
Professor Blankley also instituted and coaches the Nebraska Law College Representation in Mediation Competition for students. This competition teaches students how to be effective advocates for their clients in mediation. Professor Blankley runs an intra-school competition and then travels with the winning students to compete against students from other schools.
Professor Blankley sits on the Board of Directors of both The Mediation Center and the Nebraska Mediation Association. She is also on the Parenting Act Evaluation Advisory Counsel, a group that is assessing the success of mediation of parenting time disputes in Nebraska. Professor Blankley currently sits as a co-chair of the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution Subcommittee on Ethics.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Law 708/G (3 cr hr)
This course covers the theoretical, practical, ethical and legal issues confronted by mediators, arbitrators, neutral evaluators, and other dispute resolution specialists and the parties they serve. The course considers the legal context within which alternative forms of dispute resolution take place. Procedures examined include: litigation, negotiation, mediation, arbitration, summary jury trial, mini-trial, early neutral evaluation, online dispute resolution and negotiated rulemaking. The status of these procedures is examined in light of existing law and from a public policy point of view. Issues covered include: confidentiality and privilege, conflicts of interest, finality/enforceability of resolutions, liability and ethical standards for practitioners, and judicial review of decisions.
Advocacy in Mediation Law 720 (2 cr hr)
This limited enrollment course considers the differing roles of the neutral and the advocate in mediation, focusing on representing clients in all aspects of the mediation process. Students represent clients in drafting agreements to mediate, preparing for mediation, attending mediation sessions, and drafting mediation settlements. The course also covers issues such as confidentiality and ethics. This course employs role-play and drafting exercises, in addition to class discussions.
Arbitration Law 709/G (3 cr hr)
A study of arbitration law, policies, process, and skills; federal and state laws pertaining to arbitration; commercial, consumer, labor, employment, securities, construction, international, and court-annexed arbitration; and other topics related to arbitration as a method of alternative dispute resolution.
Meditation Law 710/G (4 cr hr)
A study of the process in which a trained neutral third party assists others in resolving a dispute or planning a transaction. Students will be trained in basic mediation skills through readings, demonstrations, simulations, and the keeping of a mediation journal. Topics covered include the nature of mediation and its relationship to other forms of dispute resolution, the nature of conflict, models and styles of mediation, negotiation theory, communication skills, the interest-based mediation process, the representation of clients in mediation, special issues relating to attorney mediators, and mediators standards and ethics.
Negotiation Law 740/G (3 cr hr)
This class will examine a variety of negotiation styles and give students an opportunity to apply these styles in a series of increasingly complex negotiation problems. Students will be expected to complete a journal which relates class discussions, lectures, readings, and personal experiences into a guide book for future negotiation practice. Negotiation problems will include plea bargains, personal injury cases, commercial negotiations, and labor management disputes. Strategic and psychological factors present in negotiation styles will be examined. The purpose of the class is to improve negotiation performance and broaden the repertoire of strategic and stylistic choices available to the student negotiator.
Legal Profession Law 790/G; 3 (cr hr)
A systematic study of the principles of professional responsibility governing the practice of law in the United States. This course meets the faculty's requirement for a course in professional responsibility.
A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act Geo. Mason L. Rev., (2015)
Impact Preemption: A New Theory of Preemption Under the Federal Arbitration Act, Fl. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2015)
Lying, Stealing, and Cheating: The Role of Arbitrators as Ethics Enforcers, 52 U. Louisville L. Rev. 443 (2014)
Advancements in Arbitral Immunity and Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards Create Ethical Loopholes in Arbitration, JUSTICE CONFLICT & WELL-BEING (2014)
Adding By Subtracting? How Limited Scope Agreements for Dispute Resolution Representation Can Increase Access to Attorney Services, 28 OHIO ST. J. DISP. RESOL. 659 (2013)
Taming the Wild West of Arbitration Ethics, 60 U. Kan. L. Rev. 925 (2012)
Keeping a Secret From Yourself? Confidentiality When the Same Neutral Serves Both as Mediator and as Arbitrator in the Same Case, 63 Baylor L. Rev. 317 (2011)
Interlocutory Appeal of Non-Final Class Action Arbitration "Awards", 34 Vermont L. Rev. 439 (2010)
Multi-Jurisdictional ADR Practice: Lessons for Litigators, 11 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 29 (2010), with Emily E. Root and John Minter
Empirical Research on Consumer Arbitration: What the Data Reveals, 113 Penn. St. L. Rev. 1051 (2009), with Sarah R. Cole
Online Mediation, 8 Tol. L. Rev. 193 (2006), with Sarah R. Cole
Be More Specific! Can Writing Detailed Arbitration Agreements Expand Judicial Review Under the Federal Arbitration Act? 2 Seton Hall Circuit Rev. 391 (2006)
Confidentiality or Control: Which Will Prevail as Confidentiality and 'Good Faith' Negotiation Statutes Collide in Court Annexed, 4 Rutgers J. Confl. Resol. (Spring 2006)
Class Actions Behind Closed Doors: How Consumer Claims Can (and Should) Be Resolved by Class Action Arbitration, 20 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 451 (2005)
Commentary, Arbitrability After Green Tree v. Bazzle: Is There Anything Left for the Courts?, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 697 (2004)
Note, Are Public Records Too Public? Why Personally Identifying Information Should be Removed from Both Online and Print Version, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 413 (2004)
Cross Cultural Negotiations For U.S. Negotiators,Kristen M. Blankley, ed., United States Air Force, publ'shr. 2006
Arbitration, in Handbook of Dispute Resolution (Jossey-Bass 2005), with Sarah R. Cole.
Winner for "Confidentiality or Control: Which Will Prevail as Confidentiality and 'Good Faith' Negotiation Statutes Collide in C 2004 American Bar Association James Boskey Alternative Dispute Resolution Writing Competition
First Place for "Confidentiality or Control: Which Will Prevail as Confidentiality and 'Good Faith' Negotiation Statutes Collide 2004 Nancy H. Rogers Prize in Dispute Resolution
Custody & battling for equal parenting time KLKN (2015)
Consumer Agency to Review Mandatory Arbitration in Financial Services Baltimore Sun, 2012
Class Lectures by Professor Blankley
Can Careful Drafting Expand Judicial Review?, The Mayhew-Hite Report, vol. 5, issue 2 (2007)
Can Class Action Arbitration Decisions Actually Bind Unnamed Class Members?, Acresolution, Spring 2005, at 28
Res Judicata and Class Action Arbitration Awards, The Mayhew Hite Report, vol. 4, issue 1 (2005)